🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.