🔗 Share this article

Via an unsigned order, the U.S. Supreme Court permitted Texas to employ a revised congressional boundary scheme that could add up to five new Republican-leaning districts. The 6-3 ruling, released on Thursday, upholds a request by the state to lift a federal judge's block that had invalidated the redistricting plan in November.

Justices' Rationale

The federal judge wrongly interjected itself into an active primary campaign, generating considerable confusion and disturbing the sensitive balance of power in elections, the supreme court said in justifying its ruling.

The federal court had previously found that Texas had probably sorted voters according to their race – a practice known as racial gerrymandering – when it enacted the redistricting plan. It had mandated the state to revert to the maps created after the most recent national count for the forthcoming election.

Strong Dissenting Opinion

With a sharply worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the majority's decision. She argued that it disrespected the work of the district court, noting that its decision was actually authored by a judge nominated by former President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan stated in a opinion supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, The majority's order ensures that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its boosted favoritism, will control next year's elections. And it means that many Texas residents, unjustly, will be grouped in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has stated year in and year out, is a violation of the U.S. Constitution.

Countrywide Redistricting Struggle

The ruling is part of a countrywide battle over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in efforts to transform the U.S. House map to protect a fragile Republican majority. Ordinarily, boundary revision occurs after a new decade's census. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to initiate a brazen off-cycle redistricting earlier this year triggered a series of events among other states.

Conservative legislators in including North Carolina and Missouri have also passed redistricting plans that are estimated to yield several additional conservative seats. Democrats, meanwhile, have pushed back with their own plans in states like California and Virginia, which could offset those potential gains.

Partisan Reactions

The Texas AG hailed the High Court's decision. In a statement, he said the order upheld Texas's prerogative to draw a map that guarantees electoral outcomes favorable to the GOP. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he added.

On the other hand, opposition party representatives decried the decision. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the leader of a major Democratic campaign committee.

Another leading Democratic figure said the court had another time damaged its legitimacy by approving a racially gerrymandered map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he concluded.