🔗 Share this article

Former President Donald Trump has consistently shown his desire to see critics investigated, exerting influence on the DOJ to prosecute former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

"We can't delay further, it's damaging our reputation and trustworthiness," the leader stated recently in a Truth Social message.

"I was impeached twice, and charged me (5 times!)" he declared, referencing the multiple legal proceedings he faced after departing the White House in 2021 and James's lawsuit.

Both have since been indicted, in cases that many specialists have stated appear to be politically motivated and challenging to win in court.

But the latest allegations against a presidential opponent, former security advisor John Bolton, differ significantly, legal specialists and ex-prosecutors assert.

"In my opinion, comparing Bolton's charges to James' is like comparing two different things," said Mark Lesko, a ex federal prosecutor for the Eastern District of New York.

This Details of the Case

Bolton has been criminally indicted on national allegations pertaining to the supposed mishandling of classified information. Since leaving the White House in 2019, he has become a vocal Trump critic, going so far as to call him "remarkably ignorant" and unfit for the presidency in his book.

Experts say that while there may be political reasons to target Bolton, the procedures used to secure an charge and the evidence gathered against him indicate a possibly stronger case than the DOJ brought against Comey.

"This misconduct that's being claimed is both more serious and seems to have taken place over a significant period of time," said Carissa Byrne Hessick, a professor at the University of North Carolina School of Law.

Throughout his time as Trump's national security adviser, and following his 2019 White House departure, prosecutors alleged that Bolton placed the nation at danger by wrongfully retaining and sending classified information to family members using insecure means, including AOL. Several of the documents were marked top secret.

The charge states that at a certain time a hacker accessed to Bolton's account where documents were kept and transmitted an seeming threat to cause "the biggest scandal since Hillary [Clinton]'s emails were released".

Bolton entered a not guilty plea during a hearing on recently to eighteen separate counts of mishandling classified information.

Political Motivation or a Substantial Case?

The schedule of his indictment - coming on the heels of allegations against Comey - has revived concerns about external influence on the legal system.

Trump once implied Bolton belonged in prison, and described him a "sleazebag". Bolton, for his part, authored a book about his experience in the Trump administration that was highly critical of the leader.

"There's no question that the timing of this charge, when combined with additional cases, has prompted doubts about the validity of these charges, and the reason these counts are being filed at this time," said Jamil Jaffer, founder and executive director of the National Security Institute.

However, he added, "should the DOJ is able to demonstrate the facts stated and show the material is correctly classified, his conduct may very well have broken the statute".

Prosecuting such a high-ranking official for mishandling sensitive materials is "rare" but not unprecedented, noted Carrie Cordero, a expert at the Center for a New American Security.

"Situations that involve classified information pose challenges to prosecute, but they can and are filed against equally low-level and senior officials, from time to time," she explained.

Similarities to Examinations into Trump and Biden

Trump likewise encountered charges of wrongfully storing sensitive materials at his Mar-a-Lago property in Florida and hindering their return, but that case was ultimately thrown out by a federal judge and negated by his re-election as president.

A independent investigator additionally determined that ex-President Joe Biden improperly stored classified documents from his period as vice president, but did not criminally charge him.

Bolton's case shares characteristics to Biden's sensitive materials matters, said Mr Lesko, who also held a top security position at the DOJ.

Strict protocols regulate the management of classified documents. To secure a guilty verdict, the government must prove that Bolton was aware the material he was sending was classified, and he had to knowingly transfer it to someone without authorization to obtain it.

"Due to the sensitive character of the information at issue in this matter, we lack a great deal of details about why the government contends things like the diary entries and the additional information he shared by email, and why there were classified," explained Mr Jaffer.

A More Conventional Legal Action

The procedure by which the Justice Department initiated this legal action will be closely examined, following Trump publicly posted his wish to see his political opponents prosecuted and several of those charges came to fruition.

But Mr Lesko indicated in Bolton's case, authorities appear to have followed standard procedure.

"The Bolton prosecution and eventually the indictment seemed to have followed the regular process including the rules and standards within the DOJ," he stated.

In contrast to Comey's brief, concise indictment, Bolton's was a more "conventional" document that "explicitly outlines the details involving the facts and circumstances in this instance," Mr Lesko commented.

"It appears reasonably consistent with a series of precedents... where public servants mishandled and transmitted classified material."